me me me (whose self-absorbed?)

I think I am a “generalist,” “a jack of all trades, master of none.” I am interested in the “big picture” and like to brainstorm ideas that connect stuff in ways I haven’t thought of.

I am thinking about this because once again I am putting myself on the line with a bit of classical performance this week. I am a trained organist, harpsichordist and pianist. Of these three I have had the least formal training on piano.

I trace my training to the two or three years I spent with Richard Strasburg at Ohio Weslyan. I moved there with my first wife and son to study composition. I studied piano to make the entrance exams.

Basic Principles in Pianoforte Playing
I brought this book to my piano teacher, Richard Strasburg, years ago to ask him a question. He pointed to the woman on the cover and said, that's my teacher. I have obviously taken this pic from Amazon. I also linked it in the URL so you should actually be able to click on it and look at exceprts.

Strasburg was a student of Rosina Lhevinne. His pedagogy was impeccable and engaging. I have spent the many years since applying what he taught me in those few years. I have had much more training on organ and harpsichord.

So of course this week I am playing a piano part to the Mendelssohn trio that has been challenging to learn.

Last year I gave an organ recital that stretched me, learning new material that wasn’t easy for me.

I like doing this. I like taking the risk and reaching for an exciting performance.

And I have loved working with two good string players.  My trio meets about once a week and we have developed a good beginning at ensemble. It’s time to air it.

This kind of performing is a lot like walking a tight rope for me.

I can do it. But I have to keep my balance and focus. My teacher, Craig Cramer, who is a world renowned performer, told me once that every time he plays in public he “goes up against the wall.”

He has tons more technique than I do, but I do the same thing especially with difficult (for me) classical music.

I said I was a generalist. By this I mean that I love doing music in many ways. I love composing. I love improvising. I love the Baroque harpsichord literature and can probably play this stuff better than anything else I do.  I love piano music and play through and rehearse it constantly. I love playing the organ. I don’t love all the literature that most classical organists love. I mostly like th organ music of tthe Baroque, pre-Baroque and some of the music written in the last 5 or 6 decades (with an emphasis on dissonant music and more recent new and original music).

I also enjoy church work. I could take it or leave it, but it has provided me with a living in my life. I am interested in hymnody and I passionately love spirituals and gospel.

I compare this to musicians I have known who seem to have a highly specialized approach to their love of music and any one area of my many interests could (and does) provide them with enough for a lifetime.

But like I say, I’m a generalist. And I like being a generalist. I like the insights that hit me from this perspective. Like the relationship of jazz theory pedagogy to the many incarnations of classical music theory pedagogy.

Being a generalist is common (I think) in composers. When I examine historical music (mostly but not all classical), I can see the wide influences that are present in the works of master composers like Bach, Haydn, Beethoven, Mozart.

It’s like the novelists who attract me. They bring a wide perspective and sense of the world and living to the story. This enlarges me as I read it and I gain perspective and satisfaction and am challenged.

But enough about me. Ahem.

About admin

This information box about the author only appears if the author has biographical information. Otherwise there is not author box shown. Follow YOOtheme on Twitter or read the blog.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.